Things You're Just Supposed to Know

Most of the time, Long-Forgotten assumes that its readers are already familiar with basic facts
about the Haunted Mansion. If you wanna keep up with the big boys, I suggest you check out
first of all the website, Doombuggies.com. After that, the best place to go is Jason Surrell's book,
The Haunted Mansion: From the Magic Kingdom to the Movies (NY: Disney Editions, 2003; 2nd ed. 2009).

This site is not affiliated in any way with any Walt Disney company. It is an independent
fan site dedicated to critical examination and historical review of the Haunted Mansions.
All images that are © Disney are posted under commonly understood guidelines of Fair Use.

________
.

Friday, May 28, 2010

The Bride and the Leaping Skull

.
The photoshops below have been revised in light of new evidence that appeared in July of 2011.
Other new material is in pink, reflecting an update in September 2013.

In evaluating the thematic cohesion of the original attic, in which the two blast-up ghosts foreshadowed the Hat Box Ghost, who in turn was husband to the Beating Heart bride, I thought it would be helpful to re-create the original bride in her original position as much as possible, showing how the second blast-up may have looked positioned directly in front of her.

It should be stipulated that it is possible that no blast-up was in that location when the HM opened.  The blueprints show that as of May 1969 there was no popup planned for there.  They show instead a popup at the right side of the attic exit, just inside the attic.  I have no recollection of that arrangement, and I suspect but cannot now prove that they decided to move the popup (a blast-up type) to its position in front of the bride before the ride opened.  A blast-up was in that spot until Constance showed up in 2005, and no one seems to remember a popup by the exit.

According to Tony Baxter, documentary evidence suggests that "a lot of drapery material made from transparent plastic" was there with the bride. This was discarded entirely when she was moved across the track to the Hat Box Ghost's vacated position.

In reality, we now know (thanks to new evidence rediscovered in August 2013) that between the two attic posts in front of her was stretched, floor to ceiling and post to post, a sheet of plastic or nylon, and perhaps this is the fabric that Tony was referring to.  It probably would have served the purpose of making her look cloudier or distorted.  This accords very well with my personal memories, which I described in 2007 like this:  "Well, when we saw her there 8/14/69 my brother and I both thought she looked murky. The fabric [of which Tony B spoke] plus the figure plus the adjacent wooden attic structure almost made her look like she was standing in a doorway or cabinet or something. My theory is that they were worried that a simple figure so close to the track would just look like a mannequin, and they deliberately tried to obscure her a bit."  I suppose now that it was the plastic/nylon screen between the attic posts that gave an impression of her standing in a cabinet or doorway.

There are no photos, but some murky film footage emerged in July of 2011, and together with other clues it was enough to establish that this version of Beating Heart was the "Corpse Bride" version.  I've worked up a pair of photoshops of the scene, one with the blast-up hidden and one with it in sight.  If this is indeed what was there originally, the way the two figures were arranged violently juxtaposed them.  Their relationship would have been made clear by the Hat Box Ghost.



Just to get your bearings, here's the same scene pre-Constance, in 2002.  Note the piano on the far right, added in 1995.



And here's the same scene today, uglified by the flash but useful for getting your spatial orientation.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

The Hat Box Ghost














(animated gif by Boogafrito)

I'm interrupting our bride series because I'm hoping to get permission to use some very fine photos.  Seems like as good a time as any to turn to the attic's other famous resident, her groom.  Edit:  Some exciting new film footage has surfaced since this blog post first appeared.  See below.  There are further small updates (July '13) in bright yellow.

The Hat Box Ghost:  Fact and Fiction

If this were the mid-1990s, an article on the Hat Box Ghost would have to spend a lot of space (1) explaining what the heck the "Hat Box Ghost" is, and (2) arguing that such a figure once existed.  It was a classic case of a "Long-Forgotten Haunted Mansion Effect."

What a difference 15 years makes—especially if a little thing that starts with "www" explodes during those 15 years.  Now the problem with writing about the Hat Box Ghost is how to say something that hasn't already been said umpteen times, and how not to alienate readers who are tired of hearing about him.  In some ways I can't blame them.  When the merchandizing arm of Disney began planning how best to celebrate the Haunted Mansion's 40th anniversary (and how best to soak the fans for every spare nickel), they decided to make the HBG their main mascot and plastered his visage all over the place: HBG on posters, HBG on online announcements, HBG pins, computer-animated HBG hosting the Haunted Holidays website—you couldn't escape the HBG's evil grin if you paid any attention to the HM 40th at all.  Frankly, I couldn't wait for it to be over and gone.

For readers who still need the basic facts about the HBG, there are good treatments herehere and here.  (If some of what follows sounds suspiciously similar to what you find at those links, it's not because I'm ripping them off; it's because I had a hand in their composition.)  Most of the known photographs of the HBG can be seen at those links as well.  They've been posted and re-posted ad infinitum (some would say ad nauseum).  Nowadays, you can even feast your eyes on schematic and electrical diagrams for the figure.  Among the photos, one stands out.  It's unique, and it's regarded by many aficionados as the most precious photographic relic of all time from the Mansion's entire history:

This photo simultaneously explodes two myths.  It proves that he did exist and was installed in the ride, and it proves that the general public did see him.  This shot is taken from a doombuggy.  It is highly unlikely that Cast Members were allowed to take flash photos during their pre-opening preview (the "soft opening") or that one of them would have foolishly risked his/her job by trying to take one on the sly.  This is not a professional photo either.  Just about the only thing it can be is a tourist snapshot.

In July of 2011 some amazing home movie footage was posted at Disney History Institute.
It includes actual film of the Hat Box Ghost taken in August 1969.



Well, what can I say here that hasn't been said everywhere else?  How about a couple of eyewitness testimonies?  Here's my lovely little tale, something I've recounted many times.  If you've heard this one before, let it scroll, baby, scroll.  Our family had our usual annual DL trip during the first week of August, 1969.  On the Jungle Cruise, between Trader Sam and the dock, the skipper asked us if anyone knew what was happening this weekend.  Nope.  In a basso profundo, he told us that the Haunted Mansion was opening, wisecracking that as usual Disney only took ten years to build a ride.  My brother and I went from ecstasy to despair in the course of about three seconds.  We had been waiting it seemed like forever for that old house to open its gates.  Now we had barely missed it and would have to wait a whole year to see it.  Reasonably enough, we concluded that life stank.

Well, a week or so later, some business or other required us all to ride through Anaheim, and as we passed within eyesight of the park, my Dad suddenly asked my brother and me if we'd like to go in for a couple of hours (it was already late in the day).  This was unheard of.  Once or twice a year was about it for our family DL trips, and the visits were never close together.  He knew how badly we wanted to see the haunted house, and—bless 'im—he just decided to indulge us this once.

Ka-chow.  Speed, I am speed.  I'm racing down Main Street, swinging through Adventureland, knocking over old ladies (kidding, just kidding), and getting into the looooooooong line.  I've got some great memories from that day.  I've told you about the hitchhiking ghosts in the mirror.  But in retrospect the most valuable has turned out to be my memory of seeing the Hat Box Ghost.  This was August 14th, Thursday of opening week.

As our doombuggy turned to scoot into the attic, the first blast-up ghost caught me just perfectly, just exactly as designed.  It's one of those things that can only really surprise you once, and luckily for me the timing was exquisite.  There were the other pop-up ghosts too, of course.  The methodical screams and squeals every few seconds pretty much advertised their presence. Coming up soon on the left was this murky, bridal figure, back among the rafters and debris.  The first time through I don't think either of us even recognized that she was a bride.   And at the end of the attic scene there was this well-illuminated, creepy little old man in the corner on the right, wearing a cloak and top hat, and holding a...I guess that's a hat box?, with his hand quavering on top of his cane, as if he was a very old man.  Very creepy, and unlike anything else in the attic.  In the course of what must have been two or three or four rides that day I noticed that the hat box would slowly light up and had a head inside.  I noticed nothing unusual about the other head.  It wasn't disappearing and reappearing, like we learned later it was supposed to.  You know, like this:

(animated gif by maddartist Larry Higbee)

And that was it.  On our next visit several weeks later (with a church youth group—we really got lucky with DL visits that year), the weird little old man was gone, and the bride was in his spot.  I figured this was a temporary situation, that something was wrong with the little guy.  Even at the age of 14, I knew that figures disappeared from rides now and then for repairs, but they always came back.  For a long, long time—far longer than seems rational—I always looked for him whenever we visited DL, thinking he might be back.  Not until 2002 and the discovery of Doombuggies.com did I learn enough about what had come to be called "The Hat Box Ghost" to know that he had never really come back.

In conversation with the one other trustworthy eyewitness that I've found (a guy who went on to work with Marc Davis for some 14 years, incidentally), more details emerged.  He visited the park often in those early days.  He tells me that the first time he saw the HBG his face did indeed disappear and flash into the hat box, but the next time the effect didn't work right:  the face was continually lit, but the hatbox face continued to flash on and off.  (This is what I remember.)  Another time the face was completely blackened while the hatbox continued to flash away.  He says that later on, at least once, they moved the bride out of his spot and tried the figure yet again.

Now, these are the recollections of one person from when he was 11 years old, so the usual precautions about the deceptiveness of memory apply, but the account is inherently plausible, and together with other testimonies, a tentative history can be patched together.

The HBG was definitely there for the "soft opening" and seen by Cast Members Aug 7—8.  It was noticed immediately that the effect didn't work very well (catching problems is one of the reasons they have CM "soft openings," after all).  They pulled him out before the HM opened to the public the next day, Saturday the 9th.  Over the course of the next week or more, perhaps for a month, they tried to get the effect to work, reinstalling and removing the figure perhaps several times before finally giving up and permanently removing him.  This explains why some early riders, even opening-day riders, have no recollection of the figure, and the false notion that he was never seen by the public became such common currency that it wound up in the first edition of Jason Surrell's generally reliable book, The Haunted Mansion: From the Magic Kingdom to the Movies (2003).  Significantly, in the second edition (2009), this denial has been watered down to an admission that maybe the public saw him.

Update 7-29-13:  Tony Baxter has found maintenance records proving that the Hat Box Ghost was definitely in use for at least a few weeks.

What was the problem?  The face was probably painted with special ultraviolet-sensitive paint, which is not identical to the typical fluorescent paint that glows under a black light.  It was supposed to disappear when the focused ultraviolet spotlight on it was turned off.  The problem was that there was too much ambient light in the attic for the face to fully disappear on a figure so close to the track, and the illusion was unconvincing.  After he was removed, the bride was shifted to his spot so that the attic would still have a climax of sorts, and that was that.

The Hat Box Ghost:  Becoming a Legend

So.... how did this failed character become such a legend, almost a cult hero?  Well, you can credit (or blame) the souvenir record albums, first and foremost.  Both the "Story and Song" LP, intended for older kids and young teens, and the children's record describe him in some detail and feature him prominently in their artwork.  These records were popular and were sold at the parks for years.  This means that an entire generation of HM fans grew up hearing about the ghost and seeing his image.  He is described in connection with the bride in the attic.  Well, here's the attic, and there's the bride.  This is where that ghost with the hat box is supposed to be.  So where is he?  The records ensured that he was never going to be completely forgotten.  In short, you can credit a lot of the Hat Box mystique to these words...

The Hat Box Ghost on the Children's Record


The Hat Box Ghost on the "Story and Song" album


...and to these images:


Note that the "Story and Song" LP cover puts him smack dab in the middle, like he owns the place:



He also gets his own page in the 11-page booklet included with the album:



The other thing that kept the HBG flame lit was Disney's use and reuse of publicity shots for the HM featuring the HBG.  It seems that early in 1969 Disney decided they needed some eye-catching promotional photos to include with press releases about the soon-to-be-opened Haunted Mansion.  Special effects whiz Yale Gracey was recruited, and he struck a series of whimsical poses with HM ghosts, most of them reflected cleverly in a sheet of glass (the old "Pepper's Ghost" trick) or double-exposed.  There were a lot of these, giving newspapers a wide assortment from which to choose.


Not only that, but numerous poses from the same photo session were usually released, giving the papers even more choices within choices.  As it turned out, the most popular shot was Yale posing with a HBG prototype (not the actual figure).


At least eight different pictures from that particular photo shoot found their way into various publications.


Disney also used them in their own publications, naturally.


The significant thing is that Disney continued to recycle these, even after the HM had opened.  The shot below appeared in a popular souvenir history book, Disneyland: The First Quarter Century, published in 1979, as well as in subsequent incarnations of the book (...The First 30 Years; ...The first 35 Years).  In the book's treatment of the HM, the HBG was the only ghost shown, since this was the only "interior" HM photo in the spread:


Naturally, anyone familiar with the record albums recognized the HBG immediately and was set to wondering whether it had, in fact, existed.  Look Fred!  There it is in a photo!  (Incidentally, I think that what Yale is holding in his hands is an early prototype for the organ banshees.)  Thanks to this misleading photo, and perhaps others in the series, some people (including Tony Baxter at one point) concluded that the HBG effect was accomplished through the use of a Pepper's Ghost illusion.

So you've got the souvenir record albums and you've got the Yale and HBG photos.  Last but not least, there was a groundbreaking article about the HBG in E-Ticket magazine #32 (Fall 1999), including never-before-seen photos of the actual figure.  Imagineer Chris Merritt, a long-time HBG aficionado, can be credited with exhuming most of this new material from long-forgotten files in the WED/WDI archives.  In turn, Jeff Baham and Doombuggies.com gave the Merritt/E-Ticket material wide exposure, recapping it for the Internet-savvy HM fan and adding a few new tidbits as well.

You often hear another detail that is supposed to deepen the mystery:  All the original molds for the figure have disappeared without a trace!  We're told this is highly unusual.  The actual reason for this "disappearance" is simple: there probably never were any exclusive HBG molds.  His head is identical to "Ezra," the tall hitchhiking ghost, and his hands are identical to the hands on the guy trying to open his coffin.  His hat is the same thing the coachman and the picnic guy in the graveyard scene originally wore.  There are no other molded parts to the figure, just aluminum tubing, wire, costuming, and wads of plastic wrap.

Put it all together, friends, and it's no mystery why a sort of Hat Box mystique began to develop.  He was the ghost of a ghost, leaving an ongoing sense of his absence in the attic.  He was a palpable presence there, made real only by memory.  A mystery.  An enigma.  The perfect place for a ghost, living his unlife somewhere between your imagination and the solid walls of the Mansion.  Best ghost in the house, some would say, because he's there but you never see him.  Hey, who am I to disagree?

I came up with a photoshop to try to give some inkling of what he looked like, and now even that stupid picture has been sucked into the vortex of HBG misinformation.  It has been taken as genuine by many people—including Disney, who used it at their Haunted Holidays website!


Flash update! This thing was even put on display in the Disney Gallery on Main Street in Disneyland, in July 2014.


It's a photoshop, people.  It's. Not. Real.  I even made some "magic eye" 3Ds out of it:



The Hat Box Ghost:  The Background

Oboy, this is the good part.  Shut up, it is too.

We have already remarked in earlier posts how the HM gags had to be instantly recognizable, jokes you could "get" in a split second.  We saw how the Mummy tableau in the graveyard represented a rare failure in this regard.  What about the HBG?  What's the background there?

Dude, this one works.  Let's say you're (1) watching a scary movie, and (2) the "OMG-something-horrible's-about-to-happen" music starts up, and (3) the camera directs your attention to a round hatbox sitting there by itself.  What do you think is in it?  Oh come on, this is an easy one.  There's a severed head in there.  Gotta be.  This is a no-brainer (um, okay, that's probably not the best choice of words).  Why is it that when you look at a round hatbox in anything like an ominous atmosphere, you CAN'T avoid the dreadful suspicion that there's a severed head in it?  Well, for one thing, the motif is a Hollywood cliché, being used in a number of films.  For example:
  • Night Must Fall (1937) remake: 1964
  • Rear Window (1954)
  • The Thing That Couldn't Die (1958)
  • Crazy in Alabama (1999)
For another, the motif is also found in pop-culture print media.  Here's a 1968 paperback for your viewing pleasure (you sicko):



The main contributer among all these is probably Night Must Fall, which was first a play, then a film, then a radio adaptation, then a film remake.  The stage version is still performed, and the films were international hits.









Still, I have to wonder how those relatively modest sources created such a universally recognized symbol.  I almost want to go rummaging around in Freudian or Jungian categories, but I won't.  Let's go back into the attic; that's creepy enough.

The original attic in DL's Haunted Mansion was a LOT more coherent and thematically sophisticated than it is given credit for.  It's not uncommon for fans to point to the two major overhauls of the room as proof that the Imagineers were never satisfied with it, that it was the weakest room in the HM, etc., etc.

Bull-only.  Back in the day, what was the first ghost you saw when you went into the attic?  A skull-like head leaping out of a round hatbox, that's what.  Here he is in glorious 3D, and if you think that's cool, check out the same thing animated.  (Boogafrito, you rock.)





You go a little further, and just in case you missed it the first time, there it is again, this time on the left: a skull-like head jumping out of a round hatbox.


Practically right behind that second blast-up stands the original bride in her original spot.  (That standing screen wasn't there in the old days.)  Her heartbeat fills the room, so her presence fills the room.  Is she dangerous or just sort of sad?  The attic also has three regular ol' head-on-a-stick pop-ups.  They're probably a tribute to traditional spook houses, like everyone says, but they also add a touch of...I don't know...menace...to the atmosphere.  Finally, you see the climax of the scene: the Hat Box Ghost.  Holy crap, now you know what was being foreshadowed.  It's the groom!  Apparently, the Imagineers assumed from the beginning that you would assume—and correctly so—that this is the groom to the bride.  How did he get beheaded, and how came his head to be hidden in a hatbox?  The ride only gives you one real suspect to contemplate, and of course that's the bride.  Remember, her presence fills the room, and the hat box head is hideously-mockingly flipping back and forth in synch with her heartbeat.  You leave the attic full of dark suspicions.  A grisly crime, a shadowy suspect, a perverse nuptial.   Clues to something, but only clues.

The severed-head-in-a-hatbox motif dominated the original attic, and it worked because it is an instantly recognizable visual cliché drawn from the vast pop-cultural milieu of horror, crime, and mystery.  Removing the Hat Box Ghost removed the linchpin of the entire presentation, taking away the unifying climax.  It left the bride without any connection to the blast-up ghosts, and it left the blast-up ghosts without anything to distinguish them from the other pop-ups.  The overhauls of 1995 and 2006 were essentially attempts to repair the artistic damage that was done mere days after the Mansion opened in 1969.

Just to clinch the fact that the blast-up ghosts are indeed foreshadowing the Hat Box Ghost, it may be noted that Yale Gracey originally intended them to be much more explicitly skulls.  Compare his early sketch with the actual schematic for the effect:



He even built one like that.  You can barely see the top of it in this photo of Yale in his workshop.  It's at the bottom in the extreme foreground.  If you can "magic eye" it, it's much easier to see.  (I'm telling you kids, it's a skill worth acquiring).  If that isn't a "rocket skull" in a leather hatbox, then it has something to do with the Hat Box Ghost himself, I'll bet.


Speaking of leather hatboxes, that one in the Yale photo looks like it could be the actual one used in the ride, which is curious because...



I suppose I could take that further, but I'll quit while I'm a head.

If you're paying attention, you might have noticed how little the attic of today has departed from the original, thematically.  Next up, when we start taking a look at Constance, we'll see how closely related the old and the new attics are.


Friday, May 21, 2010

Here Comes the Bride, Part Three: Round Eyes and the "Middle" Brides

.
This post and previous one have been massively revised, thanks to the remarkable new photos and film that surfaced in July of 2011.  See the previous post for details.

Sometime in the late 70's (most likely), the original Corpse Bride was
removed from both Mansions and replaced with this version:


She's obviously a throwback to some earlier Marc Davis concepts (see Part One). The Disneyland story is slightly different from the Orlando story, so we'll tell them one at a time.  That one above is an early Disneyland photo.  Two round, glowing eyes in a darkened face.  Hey, how about a "magic eye" 3-D image?  Get used to these, folks; I've got a million of 'em.  Use the practice thingy over there on the right and maybe you can get the hang of it if you can't already do it.  At worst, you get two images for the price of one, so what is there to complain about?  From 1990:


For many, including your blog administrator, this is still the classic bride.  She's scary precisely because she is ambiguous.  Is she evil and threatening?  Or is she forlorn and tragic?  Is she gonna get you or is she going to plead with you for help?  The candle suggests a searching figure, which in turn suggests victimhood.  Bad guys don't search around with candles; they LIKE it dark (see John 3:20).  But I dunno, Beating Heart still gives you the creeps.  Indeed, she's the number one suspect in the murder of the Hat Box Ghost, but since he's gone, she's what the FBI calls a "person of interest."

Some time in the early 90's, the Imagineers decided to beef up the attic scene (unnecessarily, in my book).  They gave the bride a visible face, put in a phantom piano player plunking out a distorted wedding march, and re-dressed the pop-up ghosts as groomsmen, each of them shouting "I do" in a mocking sort of way.  That "middle bride" version of BH debuted in September of 1995.  This widely-reproduced photograph makes her look kind of sweet.  Notice how the eyes have been dimmed, so you can read the face?  What'd I tell you in the last post?


Maybe too sweet.  Here's another shot in which she looks a little tougher:


In some photos this version approaches something akin to creepy.  Notice how similar
we are to the Marc Davis sketch showing a darkened upper face on the candle bearer.


But it remains true that she looks more forlorn than threatening, especially with those mean old goblin groomsmen all around her, mocking her.  Sometime around 2000, it seems the Imagineers wanted to bring back a little more of the ambiguity that made Ol' Round Eyes scary (or at least scarier), so they made BH's eyes more like the blank old ones, and they put her veil down in front of her face.  The results were impressive.  These  shots by professional photogs make it easy to compare "middle bride 1" with "middle bride 2."  Definitely creepier, but still not as creepy as Ol' Round Eyes, IMO.


In 2006 they overhauled the attic yet again, replacing Beating Heart and the pop-up groomsmen with Constance and her grisly wedding portraits.  The ambiguity is all gone; she's threatening and definitely not forlorn; plus she's something that no other version of the attic bride has ever been:  comic.  So now we have an absolute split between the melodramatically forlorn bride of Phantom Manor in Paris and the gleefully homicidal wacko of the stateside parks.  (Tokyo retains an ambiguous form of the middle bride.)  People definitely tend to take sides over Constance.  You like her or you don't.  Me, I dislike having a fairly full-blown story-line foisted on me, excluding me from the imaginative process and making me a spectator only.  That gets boring.  And that's without even considering how well the character fits into its context (meh) or how well the effect is executed (meh).

I would vote to bring back Beating Heart in a heartbeat.

The story down in Orlando is similar.  Here's the WDW version of Round Eyes in 1989 and in 1990.  They liked to play around with her veil down there in Orlando, a little more than than they did at Anaheim, it would seem.  My theory is that she needed mosquito netting, this being Florida and all:


This widely-reproduced pic is undated, but she looks a lot like the '89 model above, except veiled.


Despite how she may look in those photos, when the lights were out
she was still, basically, Ol' Round Eyes, as this 1995 photo shows:


Orlando went to a "middle bride" with a fully-visible face about the same time as Anaheim.  The main difference was the hair, which was pretty crazy at WDW.  They were forever fine-tuning her face, but a lot of people never liked this version ("the smurf bride") and preferred the spookier DL middle bride.

(pix by Allen Huffmann and Mick2005)

"Smurf bride" might be a little harsh.  In some photos she looks pretty darn good:


But just as was the case at DL, the middle bride doesn't look so much threatening as forlorn (yes, I realize I'm overusing that word).  Still, WDW never got as melodramatic as DL did, since Florida was spared the mocking groomsmen shouting "I do."  Never got those.

Before we say good-bye to Beating Heart and hello to Connie,
here are two handy murals of the bride down through the years.

At Disneyland, the Corpse Bride version of Beating Heart was the original, lasting from Aug 1969 until the late 70's (?).  The round-eyed, dark-faced Beating Heart replaced her and lasted until 1995.  Then it's the first "middle bride" (Sept 1995—ca. 2000), the second "middle bride" (ca. 2000—May 2006), and Constance (May 2006—now).


At WDW, we started out with the Corpse Bride (Oct 71—late 70's?), followed by Ol' Round Eyes.  They went to a "middle bride" about the same time DL did (ca. 1995).  WDW continued to fiddle around with her over the years, but not as radically as DL did, and so I lump all the brides in the Orlando attic from 1995 to 2007 into one "middle bride" category.  Constance debuted in the fall of 2007.



Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Here Comes the Bride, Part Two: "Beating Heart"

.
That was her name, or title, I suppose you'd say.  "Beating Heart."  It's on all the blueprints and on the schematics for the figure herself, but somehow it never made its way into public usage.  Oh well.

This and the next post were extensively rewritten in July of 2011 in order to reflect newly discovered evidence for the original Disneyland bride. Further revisions were made in October of 2012 when it was realized that an important photo had been misidentified, and a rare photo of the original WDW bride was added in February of 2013.  Yet another rare photo of the DL bride was added in June of 2013, and still more info came to light in September. Good grief, more artwork surfaced in May of 2014.

In our last exciting episode, we traced BH's roots from the Brown Lady of Raynham Hall to the red-hearted candle bearer in the attic.  The project had proceeded to scale model phase, and still the attic ghostette wasn't clearly recognizable as a bride.  This final touch to the character was probably added in 1968.  The script for the "Story and Song" album refers to her as a bride, and this script in turn closely follows a '68 show script by X. Atencio.  Whose idea was it to turn this ghost into a bride, anyway?

Ken Anderson makes a modest contribution, early in the process.  He wrote four show scripts in 1957-58 (essentially four; some of them have alternate ideas already included in them).  The first script in particular (Feb '57) is often cited as the beginning of our attic bride.  In it, Beauregard the butler directs our attention to a painting and tells the sad story of Captain Bartholomew Gore (aka Gideon Gorelieu) and his young bride Priscilla.


When Priscilla discovers the horrible truth that her husband is, in fact, a bloodthirsty pirate, he kills her.  Her ghost comes back for vengeance and eventually drives Capt. Gore to suicide.  Now the place is haunted.  Bingo, haunted house.

Okay, that seems clear.  A tragic bride haunting the house, looking for revenge.  Case closed.  They just borrowed an old Ken Anderson idea.  Well, not so fast.  First of all, there's nothing associating Priscilla with the attic, and more importantly, she's a "bride" by definition b, not definition a.  A bride is a woman soon to be wed or recently wed.  The former wears a bridal gown; the latter wears a purple dress (or jeans, or whatevv), like our poor Priscilla.  Aside from the bare fact that she exists not too far distant in time from her wedding day, Pris really has nothing in common with the familiar attic bride of the finished ride.

Which one is naughty and which one is nice?  I'm not telling.

Anderson's other three scripts don't get us any closer to the attic bride.  Two of them do organize the present day's ghostly activities around a wedding feast.  In one, "Monsieur Bogeyman" is planning to marry "Mlle. Vampire," and all kinds of famous spooks and monsters are showing up (Dracula, Frankenstein, etc.).  She jilts him at the altar, and things get ugly.  (Truth be told, I'm very thankful that one ended up on the cutting room floor.)  In another, the narrator guides you through the house toward a wedding reception.  It seems the ghosts of the luckless Blood family have been trying to complete the tragically-interrupted marriage plans of one of their daughters, and sure enough, you do eventually see a ghostly wedding banquet of sorts taking place.  Anderson can be credited with the notion that a wedding gone awry would make a good basis for a haunted house, but that's about the extent of his contribution.

What else ya got?

Well, in May of 2014 a never-before-seen Marc Davis sketch was published showing a ghost bride on a stairway landing.

D23/Disney

Unfortunately, we have no date for this sketch. It does look like it may have been inspired
by the old Ken Anderson sketch based in turn on the Brown Lady of Raynham Hall photo.


If it's one of Marc's earlier sketches, it may represent a sort of turning point,
as Anderson's creepy ghost is transformed by Davis specifically into a bride.

Whenever it was done, it isn't Marc's only ghost bride artwork. One of his many, many unused
ideas for a changing portrait involved a forlorn-looking bride corpsifying before your eyes.

(Artwork ©Disney.  Animated gif by Captain Halfbeard)


This gets us even closer to where we will eventually end up. Obviously, Davis liked the ghost bride idea, and we may speculate that one day the light bulb clicked on, and he realized that his rather fierce-looking attic ghostette would actually be a perfect vehicle for the corpse bride concept.
And so it was.  At last our elusive ghost has donned a wedding gown.

They put Beating Heart in exactly the spot occupied by the maquette figure in the scale model; that is, on the left side, and a little ways to the left of the spot where today there is a ghostly piano (I'm talking DL, of course).  For you young'uns with short memories, her heart glowed red and visibly pumped back and forth, while the sound filled the attic:  Lub dub.  Lub dub.



That's where BH was on opening day, and that's where I remember seeing her on August 14th.  New info: A large plastic sheet (called "nylon 6") was in front of her, stretched from post to post and floor to ceiling, probably with the intent of making her appearance fuzzier.  That too jibes with my memory.  I remember her slowly rocking back and forth in an area that reminded me of a door frame, and she was definitely murky.
She was only there a few weeks tops.  When the (infamous) Hatbox Ghost, which was located near the exit on the right, failed to perform as hoped and was removed, BH was transplanted to his old spot.  There she remained from Aug-Sept 1969 until May 2006, when she jumped the track to the other side and became Constance, that zany hubby-whackin' axe murderer.

What did that original bride look like?  When this little essay was first posted (May 2010), that was still an open question.  On July 14, 2011, the irreplaceable and irrepressible Gorillas Don't Blog posted a photo dated "October 1975," showing the Disneyland bride.  It's unmistakably the model that has come to be known as the "Corpse Bride":


She looks like she means business.  Hey babe, lighten up.


At the time, this was thought to be the first real evidence that this particular model of Beating Heart was once used at Disneyland.  Only a few years earlier a similar photo had surfaced and had been identified by its owner as the original bride at the WDW Mansion when it opened in October of 1971.

(photo by Fred Divel)

As it turns out, that identification was erroneous.  This photo is not of the WDW attic but the DL attic, and it's merely the same figure as in the 1975 photo.  And hold the phone . . . we have yet another update: A photo surfaced in February of 2013 which shows the original WDW bride, and even though it's not a great shot, it's enough to show that WDW also started out with the "Corpse Bride."


  "Long-Forgotten" threadster Michigan Guy has put together an artist's conception of what this baby
looked like in the dark, and based on available evidence I'd say it's pretty accurate.  Kids, hide your eyes!


Here's my conception of what she looked like in the attic at WDW.  I mean it, kids: don't look!


Okay, fine.  Not my fault if you have nightmares.  Where are your parents?

With the discovery of the 1975 photo, one might suppose that Anaheim had this style when it first opened six years earlier.  (Since the second photo of the DL Corpse Bride had long been misidentified as a WDW photo, the 1971 date attached to it cannot be trusted, unfortunately.)  But still, six years is six years, and as a matter of fact, other suggestions about what the original 1969 bride looked like have been offered, so can we be absolutely certain that the 1969 original was the Corpse Bride we see in the 1975 photo?  Well, in June of 2013 we pushed the clock back another three years or so when yet another early photo of the DL bride came to light, this time dating from 1972:


Only three years out from opening day, I'd say the case for this being the original look is looking stronger all the time, but even before this, we had pretty conclusive evidence of it.  It's the eyes.

One day in June of 2011, Disney fan and historian Todd J. Pierce was going through a box of old home movies and photos he had acquired, and there he found a small reel dated August 1969.  To his astonishment, this one-minute film featured a rare glimpse of the Hat Box Ghost, as well as about three seconds of murky footage of the bride, the only known photography of the original bride in her original position.  An edited version of the film was posted at the Disney History Institute on July 9th.  Not much of the bride is visible, but you can see the red heart, beating back and forth, the tip of her glowing candle, and a number of large white smears and smudges.  Occasional details like her hair are visible only in a frame or two here and there.  Here's a GIF with a picture of the Corpse Bride superimposed on a combined still from the newly discovered film.  The candle tips don't line up, because she's holding it at different points in the arc of movement up and down.  With some other bride photos the alignment is exact, so between that and the heart it's possible to place her pretty accurately in the frame.


I've used a Corpse Bride photo for the GIF above, but you can't see her face, and all of the various types of brides throughout the years used the same body, so in truth I could have used any of them.  And as I said, there have been other candidates for the original Anaheim Beating Heart.  First, it has been claimed that this photo is of the original 1969 attic bride:


There are enough idiosyncrasies about it that at least one intelligent observer has argued that it is a pre-opening prototype and not a production figure.  The most glaring problem is the slit-like eyes.  No other bride photo shows anything like that.  Highly suspect.

In fairness, those eyes might be a conservative hold-over from the design you see in the maquette figure, which also has slittish eyes:


Not only that, but as it happens the mechanical design of the lighted eyes would allow for any amount of manipulation of their shape.  You just mask the WALL -E eye box in her head (well, that's what it reminds me of) in any way you think appropriate and get any shape eye you want.


So yeah, I suppose it's theoretically possible that the slit-eyed bride was there as a short-lived experiment, but it's not likely that she was the original.  That claim runs up against the same problem that our second candidate has.  The second candidate is the familiar dark-faced, round-eye version, as in the photo directly above.  She was only replaced in 1995, so she's well-remembered, and there are lots of photos.  For a long time it was assumed that she was the 1969 original.  Could either of these have been the original, and the Corpse Bride a revised version when she was moved into the Hat Box Ghost's old spot?

I think not.  Both the round-eyed, dark-faced version and the slit-eyed version have bright, luminous eyes.  It's the only thing to look at on their faces, after all.  But with the Corpse Bride, the Imagineers would have had good reason to use much dimmer eyes so as not to overwhelm the painted detailing on her face.  That's what happened in the mid-90's when they went to a bride with a visible face: they dimmed the eyes.  Well, one of the striking facts about the new footage of the original bride is that her eyes are not visible, with the exception of one frame near the very end of the sequence (as best I can tell).


Her red heart is plainly visible, and even her candle tip can be seen most of the time.  If this were either the round-eyed, dark-faced version or the slit-eyed version, one would expect to see the luminous eyes in more than one frame!  Only the Corpse Bride makes sense.

For what it's worth, we can also compare the CB with our earliest known photo of the bride.  That would be a fleeting glimpse of her in the background of a scene from the March 1970 Disneyland Showtime episode, which featured the Osmond brothers and showcased the new Haunted Mansion.  The program was filmed in January or February of that year, so we're mere months past opening day.  If we shrink the 1975 CB photo down, blur it, and fade it, so as to have a fair comparison, I think it bears an uncanny resemblance to the Osmonds bride, but you can judge for yourself.  That's 1970 on the left, 1975 on the right.


Exactly when the Corpse Bride was replaced is not known, neither for DL, nor for her twin at WDW.  Based on what evidence I have, the latest possible date would be the late 80's, but that's probably way too late.  A better guess would be the late 70's.

Next up:  Ol' Round Eyes and the "middle" brides.