Things You're Just Supposed to Know

Most of the time, Long-Forgotten assumes that readers are already familiar with basic facts
about the Haunted Mansion. If you wanna keep up with the big boys, I suggest you check out
first of all the website, Doombuggies.com. After that, the best place to go is Jason Surrell's book,
The Haunted Mansion: Imagineering a Disney Classic (NY: Disney Editions; 2015). That's the
re-named third edition of The Haunted Mansion: From the Magic Kingdom to the Movies (NY:
Disney Editions, 2003; 2nd ed. 2009). Also essential reading is Jeff Baham's The Unauthorized
Story of Walt Disney's Haunted Mansion (USA: Theme Park Press, 2014; 2nd ed. 2016).

This site is not affiliated in any way with any Walt Disney company. It is an independent
fan site dedicated to critical examination and historical review of the Haunted Mansions.
All images that are © Disney are posted under commonly understood guidelines of Fair Use.

________
.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Heads and Details: New Concept Art Found

.
Some newly discovered (or rediscovered)* Haunted Mansion artwork has surfaced, and we're going to get out our magnifying glass.  In one sense you could say that this post is devoted to a very narrow slice of Mansionalia, but in another sense you could say that it opens a window, allowing us to catch a glimpse of the creative wheels turning inside Mansion Imagineering back in 1968. In yet another sense you could say that reading this post may lead to a cure for emphysema, but if you do, you're kind of nuts.


Maquettes, or Should We Say...McCopyquettes?

We're terribly fond of bad puns and Haunted Mansion concept art around here, in case you haven't noticed. The artwork is surprisingly plentiful, often beautiful, and always intriguing because of what it reveals about the creative process.  Same goes for the puns.

As we all know, between the concept sketches and the three-dimensional end product there are a great many stages, which include scale models, sometimes in several intermediate sizes. You may recall that we did a whole tour of the Haunted Mansion using nothing but pictures of its scale models.  We also know that these models are peopled with figurines called maquettes, and we've seen lots of photos of those around here too over the years (yes, years; we're approaching our third blogiversary, believe it or not).  We don't tend to think of maquettes as "concept art."  That could be because the single most outstanding feature of the surviving Haunted Mansion maquettes is their general fidelity to the original Marc Davis sketches.  They're copies.



They're delightful creations, but in cases like those above it seems reasonable to regard them as renderings of concept art rather than concept art per se.  They add color and dimensionality, and often enough they add a little zing of their own, but they bring all of this to an already existing concept.  Plus, I don't think Marc himself made very many maquettes, if he made any at all, and so they are indeed someone else's representation of Marc's original idea.

However, there are a few maquettes that bear little resemblance to any other known artwork.  They're probably based on sketches that have since disappeared or have remained unpublished.  In such cases they function for all practical purposes as the concept art itself.  No one who is interested in the organist character, for instance, can afford to overlook the utterly unique maquette version, which we've pointed out before.  It represents a very distinctive take on the character.


Likewise, the attic bride maquette that we've looked at previously is
much more sinister than the artwork upon which she seems to be based.


Incidentally, where are these statuettes to be found?  Some of them have been lost or destroyed, but a lot of them were rescued
and archived, and these are brought out now and then.  In 2003, the Disney Gallery had a large number of them on display.




New Sets of Old Maquettes

There is a third category: maquettes that survived and made their way into the collector's market.  The very existence of these is frequently unknown to the public until the owners decide to sell them. That happened recently when five somewhat battered maquettes showed up in the catalogue for the Heritage Animation Art Auction in New York.  The five were divided into two groups:  two witches together and three musicians together.  The musicians sold for $11,950, but the witches were not bought.



The witches are obviously these:


The maquettes are very faithful to the Marc Davis sketch. They're fun, but
they will not be our main concern today. I want to look at the musicians.


Let's deal with this fellow immediately and get it over with: Without any question, the masterpiece among
the three is the troubadour, an unused character known to us previously only from this concept sketch:



The maquette is simply superb.  (By the way, does anyone else think he looks a little like Johnny Carson?)

As for the drummer, we'll deal with him presently. It's the harpist who really piques my curiousity, because we already had a harpist maquette. Apparently they made at least two of them, and curiously enough it may be possible to discern why they made two of them; if so, this may give us an opportunity to follow Marc Davis through part of the creative process, however tentatively.


The other harpist maquette is in the hands of a friend of Dave "Daveland" DeCaro:



Harpists and Hairsplitting

If you compare them, the two harpists have very different personalities.  What most fascinates me is the strong possibility that you can trace the two personalities to two different sketches, where the difference is far less obvious.

We have posted both of these before.  The story of their relationship and the evolution of the scene is told in the Phantom Drummer of Tedworth post.  The published copy of the older sketch leaves something to be desired, so I did a fresh scan and tried to sharpen it up as best I could.



Let's blow up the parts we're currently interested in.


What would you say?  90% the same?  75%?  Obviously they're similar.  But how do they differ?  Well, the older one (right) seems to have a bit of an overbite, almost but not quite bucktoothed.  At any rate, he's got a mouth that feels full of teeth.  He also is a teensy-weensy bit more cross-eyed than the newer harpist.  Those details aren't dramatic, but for me they drop his IQ by about 50 points below the newer guy's.  The newer harpist is more elongated. Just look at the two necks!  That, plus the higher IQ, makes him seem more quick and nervous somehow, more alert, more . . . I guess nimble is the word I have in mind.

Admittedly, this is a hairsplitting analysis we're doing here, but that's exactly the point.  As minute as these differences are, they seem to form the basis for the two maquettes.  If I am correct, both maquettes are true to their respective sketches, but they emphasize the very qualities that make them different, so much so that the two maquettes end up much further apart than the two sketches, representing in the end two different concepts of the harpist's personality.

Look at these carefully, Forgottenistas, because my thesis stands or falls right here:


We have no idea whether both or just one sketch already existed when the first maquette was made, and for all we know there may have been more sketches of which we are ignorant, so it's risky to reconstruct too detailed a narrative, but we're probably on safe ground in surmising that Marc Davis didn't like the look of the first harpist maquette and had another one made (or made it himself).  We can be reasonably confident that we have the maquette sequence correct, because we know which one ended up being used when they set up the model:  the one now in the possession of Dave DeCaro's friend.


One can only speculate about Davis's reasoning, but perhaps with the ensemble growing in size into a real band, Davis thought that the putative bandleader needed to come across as a little more competent and a little less dippy.  In his second band sketch, I think Davis does indeed signal that the harpist is the bandleader.  Let's take a fresh look at this oh-so-familiar piece:


The harpist is the tallest character (yes, that matters), and he is evidently enraptured with the music surrounding him.  The drummer?  He's a fried-egg whack job, and he's looking away from the band.  The drum carrier?  Puhleeez.  He's got an IQ not much higher than the drums he's carrying. The other two musicians have their eyes closed.  Davis was an animator of genius, and he knew how to send signals that viewers don't even realize they're receiving.  Without being consciously aware of it, you tend to read the harpist as the bandleader. One can imagine Marc being pleased with this new drawing and the way the harpist has been tweaked in order to reflect his new responsibilities. You can also imagine Davis now dissatisfied with the existing harpist maquette and having a new one made.


A Dumber Drummer

...and that's a bummer.  If you look closely, the drummer in the photo of the actual graveyard maquette set is indeed the same as the one in the newly discovered batch. That surprises me, because in my opinion he's the least impressive of the three. He's a true reflection of the drummers in the two sketches, which to my eye are more similar to each other than the sketches of the harpists, but neither this maquette, nor either of the sketches, can hold a candle to Davis's original sketch of the Drummer of Tedworth, which started this whole thing rolling.  So I'm a little surprised that they seemed content with the drummer.


It doesn't matter, though, because none of it mattered in the end, which brings us to the wistful part of the post.
There's a wist right over there, and another wist right here.  I can see a few more wists over yonder.  Lotta wists.


.                    Heading a Different Way

.                         As we all know, the final figures look very little like the sketches or maquettes. 
.                         The harpist uses a recycled head, the same one as Caesar in the ballroom.

(right pic: GRD)

As if that weren't bad enough, the same head passes within yards of Caesar,
borne upon the shoulders of the ballroom visitor I call the "Grand Dame."

This is what I mean by "ballroom visitors":

(bottom pic: K447)

. . . and this is who I mean by the "Grand Dame": 


above and below pix from Imagineering Disney

"Egads, he does look like me!"

If you find that a little surprising, pthhhhh.  That's nothing: The same head also appears on two
different characters in Pirates of the Caribbean, also divided between the sexes, and also within
yards of each other, and there the duplication is far more obvious than it is in the HM ballroom.



This is just scratching the surface.  As many of you already know, there are recycled heads all over both rides, some of them going back to the Carousel of Progress.  If you want to go headhunting and sort it all out, have at it.  I can't get into that.  It's like finding hidden Mickeys.

So the fiddling and fussing over the harpist's personality that we can now discern in the sketches and maquettes turned out to be wasted imagineering.  The reasons for this were probably economic.  You save time and money by using the same molds, and with hair and makeup,
the resultant characters are different enough, so why not?


We know too that there was a consistent drift away from the cartoony figures in many of Davis's sketches toward more realistic human depictions, and possibly that was also a factor. There is also the fact that in the Haunted Mansion, it isn't always easy to make out such details anyway.  A lot depends on variables like how the lighting levels are set and how recently and in what way the figures have been repainted.  There can be wide variances between the various Mansions too.  Here's an unusually clear, relatively recent shot of the harpist in the Orlando graveyard scene.

(pic by Chris Hebert)

So in Conclusion...

Whether or not Davis tinkered with the nuances of this character in precisely the way we have conjectured, we can still see in the sketches and maquettes how much thought went into the creation of these personalities.  And even in examples like this where it didn't matter in the end, it's a treat to find previously unknown artifacts that help us appreciate anew the extreme attention to character and detail that these studio animators brought to their theme park imagineering.  The dippier, dopier harpist is a unique and amusing creation in his own right, and this maquette may rightly be regarded as a newly rediscovered piece of Marc Davis concept art.


(This pic looks a lot like the earlier one, I know, but it
IS a different photo, from a slightly different angle.)


*Edit:  According to Mike Cozart (see comments), these maquettes have been seen before, at an early
90's auction.  Still, they've been out of sight and virtually unknown for most of their existence.

Hat tip to Jeff Baham's Doombuggies Facebook feed and FigmentJedi
at Micechat, who called our attention to the auction items.


12 comments:

  1. Those maquettes are really neat! Some of them I've never seen before. I wish Disney would produce some of those as statues or maybe even make little figurine sets based on the current animatronic figures for sale. I want Haunted Mansion figures, be they little statues or plastic toys! I actually like the goofy drummer a little bit. The actual figure just seems too angry for some reason. It's like he doesn't want to be there or maybe he's just frustrated that the band is out of tune and he can barely keep the beat to what they're playing. It's also amazing that some new paint, hair, and costuming can result in totally different characters that actually all have the same heads. That true Imagineering right there. I was wondering are there any pictures of all the figures of the ballroom visitors? I know their probably pretty hard to photograph since there's so much going on in the room. It's almost as chaotic as the graveyard! Also will there be a post addressing the hellhound? I'd like to know more about him. He's the only animal ghost we see so that makes him really unusual. I'm going to assume he has his origins in the black dogs and phantom hounds of England.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can see photos of many of the ballroom visitors at the Imagineering Disney site (see the link in between the two pix of the Grand Dame).

      Delete
  2. Thanks a lot! Those are really cool pictures! Though I have to ask why the one ghost is "naked" (no hair or clothes)? Is he like that in the ride? I hope not. He's holding flowers, is he the same figure as the clothed flower gentleman ghost? The faces don't exactly look the same. The naked ghost make me think of the time I went to Disneyland Paris and one of the pirates in the POTC ride was little more than an armature with clothes on. It was weird. Much like the animatronic faces under the HM ghosts, which scare me far more than any ghost would even dare try.

    ReplyDelete
  3. These vintage "new" Maqutettes first showed up in the early 1990's at the Howard Lowery Auction Gallery catalog. While they were not sculted by Bruce Bushman, I reacall they were from his collection. Several other Haunted Mansion maqutettes found there way to a comin-animation gallery in Santa Monica in the mid 1990's. They were all purchased by a single collector --with the exception of the one from the DaveLand lute player --he was the only one sold ($2k) before the wealthy collector bought everything. There were some Ballroom table ghosts and a caretaker. Western River maquettes and other early park models were sold in the batch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good information, thanks Mike! So it appears that these particular figures have seen the light of day at least once before. Other than that fleeting glimpse, one might say, they've remained invisible and largely unknown to the public.

      Delete
  4. What sharp eyes you have! I wouldn't have spotted most of the differences until you pointed them out.

    Maybe I'm seeing what I want to see, but it looks like they may have also used male bodies for the grande Dame and the wench in purple.

    My new fanwank is that the betankarded pirate in orange is there to bid on his sister and thus rescue her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Heh heh. Believe it or not, I was going to caption the photo with some sort of lame joke about twins separated at birth. Then I decided to have him declaring that he's never seen such a strikingly beautiful face, or some such joke. Then I decided to forget it.

      Delete
  5. I've now read this blog from top to bottom and I love it! I've never been on the Haunted Mansion (due to an incident with Madam Leota's tombstone that made a CM actually smirk), but I feel like I have because of this blog!

    -Mel

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have lurked here in this blog for quite a while now, and i am enchanted with each new theory and revelation about the mansion. I check weekly for new posts and it is such a delight to see one. Thanks so much for what you do, HBG2.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks, Mel.
    Thanks, James.
    It's a lot of fun.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I just discovered your blog and I'm catching up with past posts. Nice job -- always interesting and informative. You mention that Ub Iwerks may have "discovered" the Leota effect about the same time Yale Gracy did. Somewhere around 1953 or '54 my dad took me to a sportsman's show at the Minneapolis Auditorium. I was 8 or so. I saw a 16mm film being projected on the head of a mannequin dressed as a fisherman. The figure talked about some product -- I think it was fishing equipment. Even at 8 I was seriously interested in movies and was making simple animated films, so I'm sure I remember accurately what I saw at that show. When I first visited the Disneyland Haunted Mansion about 15 years later, I knew immediately how Leota was created and recalled seeing the effect long before. I haven't been able to track any of this down, but it would make an interesting search.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks Rod, and yes, it would not surprise me in the least to find out that the Leota Effect was "discovered" numerous times independently and even used publicly in some sort of venue somewhere. I myself have a very vivid memory from the mid-60's of seeing a wall portrait with the same inverted face optical illusion as the follow-you busts. Furthermore, I'm 99% positive it was in the Haunted Shack at Knott's Berry Farm. I remember being amazed by it and deliberately lingering after the group had moved on to the next room so I could sneak up closer to it for a better look. I got close enough to see exactly how it was done. It was in color, too. I have tried to find photos or someone else who remembers it, with zero success. But it is a vivid, clear memory.

    ReplyDelete