The photoshops below have been revised in light of new evidence that appeared in July of 2011.
In evaluating the thematic cohesion of the original attic, in which the two blast-up ghosts foreshadowed the Hat Box Ghost, who in turn was husband to the Beating Heart bride, I thought it would be helpful to re-create the original bride in her original position as much as possible, showing how the second blast-up was directly in front of her.
According to Tony Baxter, documentary evidence suggests that the original bride was surrounded by a lot of fabric. This glowed as she did and was discarded entirely when she was moved across the track to the Hat Box Ghost's vacated position. I was pleased when I first read this, because it harmonized with my memory of the bride in her first position: she blended with her background and was consequently murkier than she looked in her later positions. I speculate that the intention was to keep her from looking too mannequin-like.
There are no photos, but some murky film footage emerged in July of 2011, and together with other clues it was enough to establish that this version of Beating Heart was the "Corpse Bride" version. I've worked up a pair of photoshops of the scene, one with the blast-up hidden and one with it in sight. The way the two figures were arranged violently juxtaposed them. Their relationship would have been made clear by the Hat Box Ghost.
Just to get your bearings, here's the same scene pre-Constance, in 2002. Note the piano on the far right, added in 1995.
And here's the same scene today, uglified by the flash but useful for getting your spatial orientation.





I just came across your blog and I got to say this is awesome! I'm now glad that the Haunted Mansion has "in-depth" blog since, the Ghost Relations Department discontinued.
ReplyDeleteI have a question that you might be able to answer since it's appropriate for this post. If you watch the Osmond's trip to the Haunted Mansion, there is a brief attic scene. If you pause at 9:16,(to the left of where Donny Osmond is pointing at) there's an anonymous figure. Could that be the newly positioned bride at WDL or WDW of 1971?
Here's the link for direct timing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEPdN__ZmYo
-thanks
Yes, that figure has long attracted the notice by sharp-eyed HM fans. There is enough lateral movement in the Osmonds film to produce a 3D image of the figure. You can see it here:
ReplyDeletehttp://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y32/danolson/old%20disneyland%20bride/oldestbride3d.jpg
It's not certain, but it's very likely that it is the bride. It doesn't mean very much. The Osmonds episode was filmed in Jan or Feb 1970 (at DL, of course), and by then the bride had been in the HBG's old spot for months, the spot she would continue to occupy until 2006. The film is not nearly detailed enough to say anything definite about her appearance, but it would have been the familiar dark-faced bride by then.
...the notice OF HM fans.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for the reply- I will be looking out for more blog posts of yours!
ReplyDeleteWow! Snow White has always had a thing for dark scary places, and there's none better than the Haunted Mansion.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to more great posts. Just became a follower.
Excellent, and welcome. Being the second scary dark ride in the park, the HM owes a number of interesting debts to the first. That topic has come up several times on the "Long-Forgotten" threads and no doubt will be a blog topic here sooner or later.
ReplyDeleteIn truth, we were never married. Although I tried, I couldn't help but gawk and leer at other women and — well — everyone. The Disney Company allowed the bride with the telltale heart condition and I to deceive the visiting public in order to avoid a scandal.
ReplyDeleteNow that I think about it, that could be the real reason why I was thrown out. That business about the lights not working was just one more cover-up.
You know, I hate to be the one to break it to you (why, it's breaking my little heart, it is), but the truth has been out for some time. The certificate of authenticity accompanying the HBG big fig calls him a "skeletal suitor" and a "malevolent mate" who "jilted" the bride "once and for all." I'll grant you that this report betrays a pro-bride bias. I might have been inclined to indulge in a little "malevolent jilting" myself if my bride-to-be evidenced homicidal tendencies (first latent, later blatant). Still, I'm afraid your confession is too little and too late; the fit hit the shan years ago.
ReplyDeleteOf course, I left Bridezilla standing at the altar! Who could listen to that infernal, incessant beating for ALL ETERNITY!? But that certificate is pure LIBEL, I tell you! It's character RE-assassination!! Do I look "MALEVOLENT" to YOU???
ReplyDeleteOn second thought, don't answer that.
Oh yes, NOW you can repudiate your original intentions toward her as loudly as you wish; the fact is, Constance has ta-ta's till Tuesday. Hey, with some guys such things outweigh other considerations, like, you know, that Lizzie Borden thing. Just sayin'. The word "leer" does seem to find its way into a significant percentage of conversations about you. Just sayin'.
ReplyDeleteConstance-schmonstance!
ReplyDeleteHave you seen ELVIRA?
I've seen both of her. Rumor has it she qualifies for group insurance.
ReplyDeleteWas the Skull Bride meant to be the first and original brife before Glowing Eyes Bride???
ReplyDeleteYes
Delete